dresden_kink_mods: black and white crescent moon and stars, sort of a burn out affect (Default)
dresden_kink_mods ([personal profile] dresden_kink_mods) wrote in [community profile] dresden_kink2011-03-21 09:37 pm
Entry tags:

Discussion Post

Meta goes here! Questions of a non-modly manner go here! Everything that isn't a prompt, fill or feedback goes here! Beware of potential spoilers. Please warn for spoilers, especially Cold Days spoilers. Do not put spoilers in your subject lines.

Re: Bible and the DF

(Anonymous) 2012-04-29 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
The timeline that certain sects hold to so tightly is actually the work of a 'modern', James Ussher (1581-1656), who in much the manner of Sherlockians combed the Bible and made some assumptions when the text didn't provide a finger or toe-hold within tolerances. (That he made the assumptions isn't the problem. The problem is that as his history was printed in an authorized Bible in 1701, lots of people take it as writ.)

Many denominations (and I think the Vatican may have said something Official too) have expressed that they have no beef with evolution or the geological record.

Re: Bible and the DF

(Anonymous) 2012-04-30 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I've also heard it said by Catholics and Christians that it says in the Bible that God created animals and God created Man - but that does not mean that he created animals the way we see them today, and that does not mean that he created Man the way he is today. Following that logic, evolutionary theory (and dinos) still works.

Also, I have at least once heard the argument that in the Bible it states something along the lines of "On the first day" and then "on the second day" (my Bible knowledge is a bit rusty on the details), but it does not state that these days happen consecutively. So it could be that God separated the light from the darkness on the first day, and hundreds of years later the "second" day happened and he separated the earth from the sky (that's the second day, right?)

(Please note that the above are not my own ideas, but things that I have heard from others; I cannot say as to how they might affect any Bible Timeline theories, or how they actually play into religion.)

Since Dresden-verse magic is based a lot on faith and a lot of the Bible is based on interpretation, I think it would be possible to make the two mesh.

Interesting thought, though - would the Garden of Eden part of the NeverNever, or a third layer of existence? Since there is a big chunk missing in the human evolution chain, where no concrete evidence has been found showing the evolution from ape to the earliest humans (at least, that was the case the last time I had an evolution class), and following the idea that God created man not as he is today (evolution occurred), and following the idea that the Garden of Eden is in the NeverNever or elsewhere - a possible theory could be that Adam, Adam's first wife (I forget her name), and Eve were created in the garden. When they and their families were cast out, they became what we know as the first humans.

I am totally not looking for a religious debate here, but posing theories as to how the Bible might work in the DF-verse. Please remember that I am trying to deposit a theory of creation into a work of fiction, using only remembered bits of my history class.